The peer review process tries to ensure that only the highest quality research is published. When an article is submitted to a peer-reviewed (or refereed) journal, the editor sends it to be reviewed by other scholars (the author's peers) in the same field. These reviewers recommend that the editor reject the paper, accept the paper as is, or accept the paper with author revisions.
Though generally trustworthy, peer review is not without flaws. The Retraction Watch blog tracks when published articles are withdrawn due to plagiarism, error, fraud, or other reasons.
Search the journal title in the Library’s Journal Titles list. If not found there, search the journal title in Ulrichsweb (look for the referee’s jersey icon). You can also visit the journal’s website. If you have trouble, ask a librarian.
No. These types of articles don’t go through the peer review process.
Not exactly. All peer-reviewed articles are scholarly, but not all scholarly articles are peer-reviewed. For example, conference proceedings and technical reports are scholarly but not necessarily peer-reviewed.
This work by the Consortium Library is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License and is based on University of Texas Libraries' What is Peer Review? (CC-BY-NC). Note that linked content is covered by its own licenses.
We encourage you to license your derivative works under Creative Commons as well to encourage sharing and reuse of educational materials.